Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to find a scientific rating scheme for roof system for the warm humid tropics. The overall air-to-air thermal transmittance (U-value) or thermal resistance (R-value) of roof are most widely used properties, but these are based on steady-state heat conduction and do not respond to changing conditions of climate, design and comfort needs. The paper presents a new thermal performance index, which is based on thermal comfort and actual thermal performance of a roof design option. It provides a basis for identifying the optimum roof design for unconditioned and acclimatised regimes. A review of the acceptable limits of ceiling surface temperature is presented. The mathematical modelling for predicting performance of roof based on admittance procedure and derivation of thermal performance index is described. In the proposed scheme the galvanized iron roof is given 0% rating and the roof satisfying the comfort needs for the given climate is rated as 100%. Illustrative examples of built roofs or design options are taken from India and Australia. It clearly shows that the roofs with the highest thermal resistance are not necessarily optimum solutions.
Introduction
In designing climate responsive accommodation for the warm humid areas, where ambient air temperature and relative humidity are both above the desirable comfort level, the indoor conditions can be improved by keeping building open for natural ventilation, thus to outside conditions. As a result the outdoor and indoor air temperatures do not differ much. The primary function of building skin is to control the solar heat loads. It is necessary to shield any windows from direct sun penetration, and to reduce the heat transmitted through the sunlit walls and the roof. The east and west walls receive a good deal of radiation, but when the angle of incidence is small (early morning and late afternoon) the intensity of radiation is not at its maximum. The north and south walls receive comparatively little radiation and are much easier to shield with overhangs. The walls are easily shaded by overhanging eaves, verandas or verdant environment and therefore gradually acquire temperatures near to the air temperature. However, the roof is the most exposed to impacts of solar radiation, as it receives sunlight for practically the whole of the day, and in the tropics the angle of incidence is close to the normal in the hotter parts of the day. Heat gain through roof elevates ceiling surface temperature and causes radiant heat load on the occupants. The term ‘roof’ includes the roof structure, the outer covering, and layers of insulating materials or membranes and the ceiling.
The question arises, how much radiant heat load can be permitted without harmful effects on the life and work of the inhabitants? The answer to this question is guided by two conflicting motives: to satisfy comfort needs of the people of the warm humid tropics and to optimise the performance of the roof to provide good value of the investment. In other words, find a performance rating for roofs which is high enough to ensure progress and yet realistic enough to be generally attainable.
In tropical climates steady-state property, the overall air-to-air thermal transmittance (U-value) or thermal resistance (R-value), alone cannot provide a satisfactory performance criterion for rating roofs since the thermal performance of a roof is a function of the sol-air temperature wave form which is a function of climatic factors, surface colour and orientation. A performance criterion based on thermal comfort and actual thermal performance of a roof section would be appropriate.
Identification of problem is presented in the next section with a field experiment in India and followed by discussion on the state-of-the-art. The sections following it explain derivation and mathematical modelling of the new thermal performance index and its application for exemplar roofs in India and Australia.
Section snippets
Problem identification
All over the world indigenous and vernacular architecture are replete with appropriate built responses to climate which is also true in India. However, this would not be true in contemporary architecture with proliferation of modern technology, which resulted in using ubiquitous building techniques all over the country irrespective of the climate. A wide spectrum of eco-friendly and innovative building systems is being introduced in the housing sector as a consequence of environmental concern.
A review of comfort limits and overhead radiant heat
There are no physiological field tests available to determine the discomfort caused due to the radiant heat from roofs in the warm humid tropics. However, there are a number of systematic studies based on laboratory experiments, which investigated discomfort caused from heated ceiling panels (used for room heating in cold climates).
Munro and Chrenko [2] and Chrenko [3] found that the elevation of the mean radiant temperature at head level due to the radiation overhead was the best parameter for
Comfort limits
Auliciems [13] formulated an adaptive, (psycho-physiological), an empirical model of thermal perception. This model relates people’s vote to some measurable environmental factors. Auliciems reported the strong correlations between thermal neutrality and mean monthly outdoor DBT and expressed by the equation of the regression of neutrality, tn, upon the mean monthly outdoor temperature, tm as follows:
Auliciems states that it is possible to determine neutralities for all parts of
Results and analysis
The methodology is demonstrated for two locations Trivandrum (India) and Cairns (Australia). The acceptable ceiling surface temperatures are calculated for two hottest months setting the environmental temperature to the upper thermal neutrality limit, when there is very little air movement. These calculations are performed for eight shape factors ranging from 0.17 to 0.24 and averages are calculated. The shape factors are calculated for a point located at a distance for 1.2, 1.35 and 1.5 m from
Conclusions and further development
Building component properties may be interpreted as “low-level” performance indicators, whereas room performance descriptions may be interpreted as “high-level” behavioural properties [29]. Thermo-physical properties (for example U value, shading coefficient) may be defined as attributes of discrete components whereas energy performance (for example environmental temperature, heat gain or loss) may refer to room properties. Furthermore, simple and ‘user-friendly’ indices may be derived on the
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thankfully acknowledge the financial assistance of AusAID (Australian Agency for International Development) for this research as part of her PhD course in the University of Queensland. She also thankfully acknowledges Dr. Richard Hyde, Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney and Dr. S. V. Szokolay, Honorary reader, Department of Architecture, University of Queensland for their supervision in this research. Finally special thanks