Article Content

Abstract

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke are leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Their frequent comorbidities and overlapping risk profiles highlight the importance of understanding shared genetic mechanisms, particularly in identifying therapeutic targets relevant to personalized pharmacotherapy.

Aim

This study aimed to explore the shared genetic architecture between stroke and CAD, identify common therapeutic targets, and provide implications for clinical pharmacy practice.

Method

We integrated multi-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics (stroke: 110,182 cases; CAD: 210,842 cases) and employed linkage disequilibrium score regression to assess genetic correlations. Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to infer causal inference. Shared genetic variants were identified through cross-trait meta-analyses (MTAG and CPASSOC) and validated using Bayesian colocalization. Pharmacogenomic pathways associated with shared genes were linked to approved drugs using a pathway-pairing score to assess the therapeutic alignment. A score of ≥ 0.5 indicated a strong alignment between a drug’s pharmacological mechanism and the disease’s genetic pathophysiology.

Results

A significant genetic correlation was observed between stroke and CAD (rg = 0.48, P = 3.38 × 10−34). Eight pleiotropic SNPs and five colocalized causal variants were identified, implicating ten disease-shared genes. Drug-target analyses prioritized the 19 approved cardiovascular agents. Beta-blockers (e.g., bisoprolol, esmolol) and antihypertensives (e.g., fenoldopam bromide/mesylate) demonstrated strong therapeutic potential (pathway score ≥ 0.5).

Conclusion

This study provides genomic evidence to support integrated therapeutic strategies for stroke and CAD. Pharmacogenomic insights into shared genetic determinants can assist clinical pharmacists in optimizing treatment selection, mitigating polypharmacy risks, and guiding precision medicine in patients with dual cardiocerebrovascular risks.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

  • Cardiovascular Genetics
  • Genetic Interaction
  • Genetic association study
  • Genome-wide association studies
  • Pharmacogenetics
  • Pharmacogenomics

Data availability

All data used in this study were obtained from publicly accessible genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Stroke data were sourced from the GIGASTROKE consortium via the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/publications/36180795), and coronary artery disease data were retrieved from the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D and associated datasets (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/studies/GCST90132315). No individual-level data were used. All analyses were performed using open-source tools as cited in the Methods section.

References

  1. Severino P, D’Amato A, Pucci M, et al. Ischemic heart disease pathophysiology paradigms overview: from plaque activation to microvascular dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218118.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  2. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  3. GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2100–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00367-2.

    Article Google Scholar

  4. GBD 2021 Stroke Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(10):973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00369-7.

    Article Google Scholar

  5. Chistiakov DA, Orekhov AN, Bobryshev YV. Endothelial barrier and its abnormalities in cardiovascular disease. Front Physiol. 2015;6:365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00365.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  6. de la Riva P, Marta-Enguita J, Rodríguez-Antigüedad J, et al. Understanding endothelial dysfunction and its role in ischemic stroke after the outbreak of recanalization therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(21):11631. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111631.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Weber C, Noels H. Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1410–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2538.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Attiq A, Afzal S, Ahmad W, et al. Hegemony of inflammation in atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 2024;966: 176338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176338.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sarmah D, Datta A, Raut S, et al. The role of inflammasomes in atherosclerosis and stroke pathogenesis. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(34):4234–45. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200427084949.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Amarenco P, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, et al. Prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with cerebral infarction. Stroke. 2011;42(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.584086.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2532–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/str.0000000000000022.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  12. O’Sullivan JW, Raghavan S, Marquez-Luna C, et al. Polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146(8):e93–118. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001077.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  13. Mishra A, Malik R, Hachiya T, et al. Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries. Nature. 2022;611(7934):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05165-3.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  14. Aragam KG, Jiang T, Goel A, et al. Discovery and systematic characterization of risk variants and genes for coronary artery disease in over a million participants. Nat Genet. 2022;54(12):1803–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01233-6.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  15. Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1236–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3406.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  16. Yu K, Li Z, Shi W, et al. Causal impact of statins on susceptibility to osteoarthritis: insights from a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024;46(5):1208–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01754-6.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Zheng S, Tsao PS, Pan C. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and cardiometabolic traits share strong genetic susceptibility to lipid metabolism and inflammation. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):5652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49921-7.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet. 2018;50(2):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. Zhu X, Feng T, Tayo BO, et al. Meta-analysis of correlated traits via summary statistics from GWASs with an application in hypertension. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(1):21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.011.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  20. Zhao W, Fang P, Lai C, et al. Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for ankylosing spondylitis. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1366736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1366736.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  21. Ursu O, Holmes J, Bologa CG, et al. DrugCentral 2018: an update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D963–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky963.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Cotto KC, Wagner AH, Feng Y-Y, et al. DGIdb 3.0: a redesign and expansion of the drug–gene interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1068–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1143.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Barbarino JM, Whirl-Carrillo M, Altman RB, et al. PharmGKB: a worldwide resource for pharmacogenomic information. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018;10(4): e1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1417.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  24. Gao H, Liu S, Mai Y, et al. Combined therapy of prednisone and mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for treating retroperitoneal fibrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(5):688–97. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223736.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Sethi NJ, Safi S, Korang SK, et al. Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;2(2):e003610. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003610.pub4.

    Article Google Scholar

  26. Mazini B, Dietz M, Maréchal B, et al. Interrelation between cardiac and brain small-vessel disease: a pilot quantitative PET and MRI study. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2023;7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00180-7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  27. Moretti R, Janjusevic M, Fluca AL, et al. Common shared pathogenic aspects of small vessels in heart and brain disease. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051009.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  28. Kitagawa K, Toi S, Hosoya M, et al. Small vessel disease burden predicts incident stroke and all-cause death, but not acute coronary event. Hypertens Res. 2024;47(11):3001–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01797-2.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Suzuyama K, Yakushiji Y, Ogata A, et al. Total small vessel disease score and cerebro-cardiovascular events in healthy adults: The Kashima scan study. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(9):973–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020908144.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Sitbon M, Corny J, Beaussier H, et al. The effect of partial patients’ adherence to antihypertensive drugs: scope for pharmacists’ role in hypertension care. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0557-9.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Li YY, Wang H, Zhang YY. CDKN2B-AS1 gene rs4977574 A/G polymorphism and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 40,979 subjects. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(18):8877–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16849.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  32. Lasek-Bal A, Kula D, Urbanek T, et al. The association of SNPs located in the CDKN2B-AS1 and LPA genes with carotid artery stenosis and atherogenic stroke. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01170.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  33. Rogozik J, Główczyńska R, Grabowski M. Genetic backgrounds and diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Clin Genet. 2024;105(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.14435.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Luo C, Wang D, Huang W, et al. Feedback regulation of coronary artery disease susceptibility gene ADTRP and LDL receptors LDLR/CD36/LOX-1 in endothelia cell functions involved in atherosclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2021;1867(7): 166130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166130.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Ji Y, Song Y, Wang Q, et al. Sex-specific association of SH2B3 and SMARCA4 polymorphisms with coronary artery disease susceptibility. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):59397–407. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19720.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  36. Lotz RC, Welter CDS, Ramos SA, et al. ABO blood group system and occurrence of ischemic stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021;79(12):1070–5. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0219.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Chen Z, Yang SH, Xu H, et al. ABO blood group system and the coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23250. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23250.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  38. Moraleva A, Deryabin A, Kordyukova M, et al. Human nucleolar protein SURF6/RRP14 participates in early steps of pre-rRNA processing. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(7): e0285833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285833.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  39. Keilhauer CN, Fritsche LG, Guthoff R, et al. Age-related macular degeneration and coronary heart disease: evaluation of genetic and environmental associations. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(2):72–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2012.10.005.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  40. Toni M, Hermida J, Toledo E, et al. Role of CFH and ARMS2 polymorphisms in retinopathy and coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2012;35(3):425–32. https://doi.org/10.23938/assn.0098.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  41. Gallego-Fabrega C, Cullell N, Soriano-Tárraga C, et al. DNA methylation of MMPs and TIMPs in atherothrombosis process in carotid plaques and blood tissues. Oncotarget. 2020;11(10):905–12. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27469.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  42. Chen YD, Yang XC, Pham VN, et al. Resting heart rate control and prognosis in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension previously treated with bisoprolol: a sub-group analysis of the BISO-CAD study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(10):1155–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000802.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  43. Wu PH, Lin YT, Liu JS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of bisoprolol and carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(3):983–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa248.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  44. Zhang J, Chen C, Liu Y, et al. Benefits of esmolol in adults with sepsis and septic shock: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(27): e29820. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000029820.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  45. Pittarello D, Bonato R, Falasco G, et al. Effects of fenoldopam on myocardial function (strain rate) in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76(9):707–13.

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  46. Mahmood S, Jalal Z, Hadi MA, et al. Prevalence of non-adherence to antihypertensive medication in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021;43(3):486–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01236-z.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (code: ZLRK202508).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

WS: Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Validation; Visualization; Writing – review and editing LZ: Data curation; Formal analysis; Validation; Visualization; Writing–original draft; Writing–review and editing ZZ: Conceptualization; Data curation; Supervision; Writing – review and editing KY: Conceptualization; Data curation; Supervision; Writing – review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kefu Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study was entirely based on publicly available, de-identified, and summary-level data from previously published genome-wide association studies. As no human participants were directly involved and no individual-level data were used, institutional review board (IRB) approval and informed consent were not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 36 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, W., Zhang, L., Zhao, Z. et al. Integrative genetic analysis of shared genetic architecture of stroke and coronary artery disease: implications for pharmacist-led precision medicine. Int J Clin Pharm (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01952-w

Download citation

  • Received 
  • Accepted 
  • Published 
  • DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01952-w

Keywords

  • Clinical pharmacy
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Genetic correlation
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Precision therapeutics
  • Stroke
WhatsApp