Sign Up Submit Enquiry

Comparative study and shape factor analysis of the EMHD flow on tangent hyperbolic tetrahybrid

Home Comparative study and shape factor analysis of the EMHD flow on tangent hyperbolic tetrahybrid

Related Articles

Contact us

Article Content

Abstract

The applications of the present findings are extensive and transformative and these findings help in improving heat transfer in thermal industrial systems, facilitating efficient operation of solar collectors, electronic cooling devices, as well as targeting and destroying cancer cells in hyperthermia treatment in the medical field. This study analyses the tangent hyperbolic nanofluid with tetrahybrid nanoparticle that is the combination of  , Ag,  and ZnO over horizontal and exponentially stretching/shrinking cylinder filled with non-Darcy porous medium. Electromagnetohydrodynamics (EMHD), Arrhenius activation energy, thermal radiation, heat source and chemical reaction were considered. The fundamental equations of non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) were derived from the partial differential equations (PDEs) with similarity variables and fifth-order Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg method with shooting technique was performed. From the model, we obtained increase in temperature profile for magnetic parameter and radiation parameter and increase in concentration profile for activation energy parameter. Shape factor analysis on Nusselt number and Sherwood number was done and compared. Heat and mass transfer rate was investigated by changing the shapes of the nanoparticle on exponential and horizontal cylinder to get good results.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

  • Fluidics
  • Fluids
  • Nanomaterial
  • Nanoparticle Synthesis
  • Nanofluidics
  • Engineering Thermodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer

References

  1. M Turkyilmazoglu, J. Heat Transfer 137(10), 101301 (2015)

    Google Scholar

  2. T Salahuddin, M Y Malik, A Hussain, M Awais, I Khan and M Khan, Res. Phys. 7, 426 (2017)

    Google Scholar

  3. W Na, N A Shah, I Tlili and I Siddique, Chin. J. Phys. 65, 367 (2020)

    Google Scholar

  4. M Turkyilmazoglu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136(5), 1 (2021)

    Google Scholar

  5. M Turkyilmazoglu, Chem. Eng. Sci. 238, 116596 (2021)

    Google Scholar

  6. I S Din, I Siddique, R Ali, F Jarad, S Abdal and S Hussain, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 39, 102390 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  7. M Turkyilmazoglu and I Pop, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 146, 106903 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  8. M Amjad, M N Khan, K Ahmed, I Ahmed, T Akbar and S M Eldin, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 45, 102900 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  9. V Bharathi, J Prakash, D Tripathi, O A Beg, A Sharma and R K Sharma, Nanomaterials and nano-liquids: Applications in energy and environment (Springer Nature, Singapore, 2023) pp. 249–279

    Google Scholar

  10. M Turkyilmazoglu and I Pop, Chin. J. Phys. 89, 1899 (2024)

    Google Scholar

  11. M Sohail, E R El-Zahar, A A Mousa, U Nazir, S Althobaiti, A Althobaiti, N A Shah and J D Chung, Sci. Rep. 12(1), 9219 (2022)

    ADS Google Scholar

  12. T Sajid, A A Gari, W Jamshed, M R Eid, N Islam, K Irshad, G C Altamirano and S M El Din, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 47, 103058 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  13. T Sajid, W Jamshed, S Algarni, T Alqahtani, M R Eid, K Irshad, G C Altamirano, S M El Din and KW Tajer, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 49, 103261 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  14. Z S Hafed, A A Arafa, S A Hussein, S E Ahmed and Z Morsy, Numer. Heat Transf. B 86(3), 1 (2023)

  15. M Sohail, U Nazir, A Singh, A Tulu and M J Khan, Sci. Rep. 14(1), 1 (2024)

    Google Scholar

  16. A H Majeed, A Z Jan, A M Alamri, S A Al Qahtani, M R Ali and A S Hendy, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 59, 104346 (2024)

    Google Scholar

  17. Y Liu, Y Jian and W Tan, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 127, 901 (2018)

    ADS Google Scholar

  18. B K Sharma, A Kumar, R Gandhi, M M Bhatti and N K Mishra, Nanomaterials 13(3), 544 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  19. K Zhang, N A Shah, M Alshehri, S Alkarni, A Wakif and S M Eldin, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 47, 103062 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  20. L A Lund, A F Chandio, N Vrinceanu, U Yashkun, Z Shah and A Alshehri, Micromach. 14(1), 106 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  21. S U Rehman, N Fatima, B Ali, M Imran, L Ali, N A Shah and J D Chung, Mathematics 10(16), 2877 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  22. E Sangeetha and P De, Heat Transf. 52(2), 1529 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  23. F Wang, A M Saeed, V Puneeth, N A Shah, M S Anwar, K Geudri and S M Eldin, Chin. J. Phys. 84, 330 (2023)

    Google Scholar

  24. C J Huang, Transp. Porous Media 128(2), 723 (2019)

    MathSciNet Google Scholar

  25. S R Reddy, P B A Reddy and A M Rashad, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45(7), 5227 (2020)

    Google Scholar

  26. S Manjunatha, V Puneeth, B J Gireesha and A Chamkha, J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 8(4), 1279 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  27. G Revathi, I L Animasaun, V S Sajja, M J Babu, N Boora and C S Raju, Nonlinear Eng. 11(1), 241 (2022)

    ADS Google Scholar

  28. Q Raza, M Z Qureshi, B A Khan, A Kadhim Hussein, B Ali, N A Shah and J D Chung, Mathematics 10(16), 3013 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  29. S S Nisha and P De, Spec. Top. Rev. Porous Media 15(2), 79 (2024)

    Google Scholar

  30. U Rashid, T Abdeljawad, H Liang, A Iqbal, M Abbas and M J Siddiqui, Math. Prob. Eng. 2020, 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar

  31. F Bosli, A S Suhaimi, S S Ishak, M R Ilias, A H Rahim and A M Ahmad, J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 91(1), 155 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  32. C Sulochana and N Sandeep, Appl. Nanosci. 6, 451 (2016)

    ADS Google Scholar

  33. J H Merkin, N Najib, N Bachok, A Ishak and I Pop, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 74, 65 (2017)

    Google Scholar

  34. N Najib, N Bachok, N F Dzulkifli and I Pop, Mathematics 10(7), 1114 (2022)

    Google Scholar

  35. A Saeed, A Tassaddiq, A Khan, M Jawad, W Deebani, Z Shah and S Islam, Coatings 10(4), 391 (2020)

    Google Scholar

  36. A Bisht and R Sharma, Heat Transfer 49(6), 3477 (2020)

    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, India

    P Senbagaraja & Poulomi De

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poulomi De.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senbagaraja, P., De, P. Comparative study and shape factor analysis of the EMHD flow on tangent hyperbolic tetrahybrid , Ag,  and ZnO nanoparticles over the horizontal and exponentially non-Darcy porous stretching/shrinking cylinder. Pramana – J Phys 99, 96 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-025-02928-1

  • Received 
  • Revised 
  • Accepted 
  • Published 
  • DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-025-02928-1

Keywords

  • Tangent hyperbolic nanofluid
  • tetrahybrid nanoparticle
  • electromagnetohydrodynamics
  • non-Darcy porous medium
  • arrhenius activation energy
  • shape factor

PACS Nos.

  • 44.30.+v; 47.56.+r
  • 47.65.−d.

Copyright © All rights reserved Designed and Developed by Digital Flavers

WhatsApp