Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to develop a new self-report measure of unconditional self-acceptance (USAS), and to examine its psychometric properties. A total of 1,137 adults aged between 18 and 76 participated in the study. To determine the reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the scale, several statistical analyses were conducted. Both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional structure, demonstrating satisfactory construct validity. For convergent validity, significant correlations were found between the new USAS and the previous unconditional self-acceptance scale. Predictive validity analyses showed that higher levels of unconditional self-acceptance were significantly associated with lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Internal consistency analyses indicated high reliability. Measurement invariance analyses revealed that the USAS functions equivalently across academic and non-academic contexts, allowing for meaningful comparisons. Overall, the findings suggest that the new USAS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing unconditional self-acceptance.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

  • Five Factor Model
  • Positive Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Psychometrics
  • Psychological Testing
  • Self-efficacy

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Balkıs, M. (2024). The role of rational beliefs in promoting mental well-being: A validation of the rebt’s psychological health model. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy42, 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00543-4

    Article Google Scholar

  • Balkıs, M., & Duru, E. (2020). Gender differences in the organizational structure of the rational/irrational beliefs in depressive symptoms. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy38(2), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00343-6

    Article Google Scholar

  • Balkıs, M., & Duru, E. (2023). Negative life events associated with COVID-19 and psychological distress: The role of irrational and rational beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy41(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00457-z

    Article Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

  • Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Chamberlain, J. M., & Haaga, D. A. (2001). Unconditional self-acceptance and psychological health. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy19, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011189416600

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chang, E. C. (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of adaptive and maladaptive aspects of performance perfectionism: Relations to personality, psychological functioning, and academic achievement. Cognitive Therapy and Research30, 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9060-7

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

  • David, D., Lynn, S. J., & Ellis, A. (2010). The role of rational and irrational beliefs in human functioning and disturbances: Implications for research, theory, and clinical practice. Oxford University Press.

  • David, D., Cotet, C. D., Szentagotai, A., McMahon, J., & Digiuseppe, R. (2013). Philosophical versus psychological unconditional acceptance: Implications for constructing the unconditional acceptance questionnaire. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies13(2A), 445–464.

    Google Scholar

  • Davies, M. F. (2006). Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. I. Correlational evidence linking two key features of REBT. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy24, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-006-0027-0

    Article Google Scholar

  • Davies, M. F. (2007). Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. II. Experimental evidence for a causal link between two key features of REBT. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy26, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-007-0060-7

    Article Google Scholar

  • Davies, M. F. (2008). Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. III. The relative importance of different types of irrational belief. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 26, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-007-0061-6

  • Ellis, A. (1976). RET abolishes most of the human ego. Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice13, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086502

    Article Google Scholar

  • Ellis, A. (1977). Psychotherapy and the value of a human being. In A. Ellis, & R. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 99–112). Springer.

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy: A comprehensive method of treating human disturbances. Birch Lane.

  • Falkenstein, M. J., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2013). Measuring and characterizing unconditional self-acceptance. In M. E. Bernard (Ed.), The strength of self-acceptance: Theory, practice and research (pp. 139–151). Springer.

  • Faustino, B., Vasco, A. B., Haaga, D. A., Chamberlain, J. M., Farinha-Fernandes, A., & Delgado, J. (2024). Exploring factor and correlational analysis of the Portuguese version of the unconditional self-acceptance questionnaire-revised. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy42(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00492-w

    Article Google Scholar

  • Flett, G. L., Besser, A., Davis, R. A., & Hewitt, P. L. (2003). Dimensions of perfectionism, unconditional self-acceptance, and depression. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy21, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025051431957

    Article Google Scholar

  • Gökmen, G., & Çakır, S. G. (2019). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin Sosyal bağlılık, Duyguları yönetme, Yaşam pozisyonları, Temas engelleri ve Koşulsuz Kendini Kabul Ile affetme düzeyleri Arasındaki Ilişkinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi4(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar

  • Huang, Y., Wu, R., Wu, J., Yang, Q., Zheng, S., & Wu, K. (2020). Psychological resilience, self-acceptance, perceived social support and their associations with mental health of incarcerated offenders in China. Asian Journal of Psychiatry52, 102166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102166

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Kapıkıran, N. A., & Kapıkıran, Ş. (2010). Koşulsuz Kendini Kabul Ölçeğinin Türk Üniversite öğrencileri Için geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Kriz Dergisi18(1), 33–44.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventory. Behaviour Research and Therapy33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • MacInnes, D. L. (2006). Self-esteem And self‐acceptance: An examination into their relationship And their effect on psychological health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing13(5), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00959.x

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Milburn, M. C. (2011). Cognitive-behavior therapy and change: Unconditional self acceptance and hypnosis in CBT. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy29, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-010-0121-1

    Article Google Scholar

  • Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–508). Sage.

  • Popov, S. (2019). When is unconditional self-acceptance a better predictor of mental health than self-esteem? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy37, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0310-x

    Article Google Scholar

  • Popov, S., & Sokić, J. (2022). Psychometric characteristics of a Serbian translation of the unconditional self-acceptance questionnaire and the development of a short form. Psihologija55(1), 107–122.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Popov, S., Biro, M., & Radanović, J. (2016). Unconditional self-acceptance and mental health in ego-provoking experimental context. Suvremena Psihologija19(1), 71–80.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Pramanik, S., & Khuntia, R. (2023). Decoding unconditional self-acceptance: A qualitative report. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy41(4), 932–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-023-00517-y

    Article Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.

  • Sariçam, H. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapies and Research7(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5455/JCBPR.274847

    Article Google Scholar

  • Scott, J. (2007). The effect of perfectionism and unconditional self-acceptance on depression. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy25, 35–64.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Szentagotai, A., & David, D. (2013). Self-acceptance and happiness. In M. Bernard (Ed.), The strength of self-acceptance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6806-6_8

  • Thompson, B. L., & Waltz, J. A. (2008). Mindfulness, self-esteem, and unconditional self-acceptance. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy26, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-007-0059-0

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, K., Zhou, X., & Xu, M. (2024). The effects of negative body image, self-acceptance, and resilience on depression in Chinese adolescents: Testing a moderated mediation model. Current Psychology43(13), 11704–11713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05288-4

    Article Google Scholar

Acknowledgements

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Author ContributionsM. B.: Collaborated with the design, collecting data and analyzing data, and writing of the study. E.D.: designed and executed the study and wrote the paper. T. T.: collected data and wrote part of the introduction.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Balkis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Social and Human Sciences Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Pamukkale University. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

About this article

Cite this article

Balkis, M., Duru, E. & Türkdoğan, T. Development of the Unconditional Self-Acceptance Scale: Psychometric Properties and Validity Study. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 43, 38 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00598-x

  • Accepted
  • Published
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00598-x

Keywords

  • Unconditional self-acceptance
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Gender
WhatsApp