Sign Up Submit Enquiry

How absorptive capacity mediates supply chain effectiveness: a quality integration approach to boosting operational performance

Home How absorptive capacity mediates supply chain effectiveness: a quality integration approach to boosting operational performance

Related Articles

Contact us

Article Content

Abstract

The importance of leveraging external knowledge to enhance quality management across the supply chain (SC) is well established in improving operational performance. However, empirical evidence on how this process unfolds remains limited. This study investigates the mediating impact of absorptive capacity (AC) on the relationship between supply chain quality integration (SCQI) and operational performance. We propose a five-step sequential mediation model, where customer and supplier quality integration indirectly affect operational performance by strengthening internal quality integration and AC. AC, evaluated through knowledge acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation, is pivotal in this process. The model highlights how external quality knowledge is assimilated and transformed into actionable insights, ultimately driving operational success. Using survey data from 264 pharmaceutical manufacturers, we applied Smart PLS to analyse the relationships. Our findings reveal the essential role of internal integration in translating and disseminating supply chain quality knowledge to enhance manufacturing capabilities. Effective communication, training, and collaboration facilitate the absorption of external insights, reinforcing operational performance. This research highlights the interconnected nature of quality integration practices across supply chain interfaces, emphasising that operational gains rely on first embedding external knowledge through internal quality integration. The originality and novelty of this study lie in uncovering a unique sequential mediation pathway, distinguishing it from prior research. By extending dynamic capability theory, we demonstrate how SCQI facilitates knowledge absorption through AC. Our findings challenge conventional views by positioning internal and external quality integration as synergistic dynamic capabilities, essential for driving superior operational performance.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

  • Organizational Learning
  • Performance Development
  • Policy Implementation
  • Self-efficacy
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Quality Control, Reliability, Safety and Risk

References

  • Abahussain E, Waheedi M, Koshy S (2012) Practice, awareness and opinion of pharmacists toward disposal of unwanted medications in Kuwait. Saudi Pharm J 20:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2012.04.001

    Article Google Scholar

  • Abdallah AB, Alfar NA, Alhyari S (2021) The effect of supply chain quality management on supply chain performance: the indirect roles of supply chain agility and innovation. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage 51:785–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2020-0011

    Article Google Scholar

  • Abou-Foul M, Ruiz-Alba JL, López-Tenorio PJ (2023) The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: the moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective. J Bus Res 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113609

  • Abourokbah SH, Mashat RM, Salam MA (2023) Role of absorptive capacity, digital capability, agility, and resilience in supply chain innovation performance. Sustainability 15:3636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043636

    Article Google Scholar

  • Agyei-Owusu B, Asamoah D, Nuertey D, Acquah IN (2022) Examining the relationship between dimensions of supply chain integration, operational performance and firm performance: evidence from Ghana. Manage Res Rev 45(12):1644–1669. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2021-0464

    Article Google Scholar

  • Akhtar F, Wang Q, Huo B (2024) The effect of relational investments on supply chain quality integration: protection or constraint of legal bonds? Int J Qual Reliab Manage 41(3):879–900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2021-0455

    Article Google Scholar

  • Al-Dweiri M, Ramadan B, Rawshdeh A, Nassoura A, Al-Hamad A, Ahmad A (2024) The mediating role of lean operations on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Manage 2(2):1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.11.017

    Article Google Scholar

  • AL-Khatib AW (2025) The impact of industry 4.0 capabilities on operational performance: the mediating effect of supply chain ambidexterity. TQM J 37:125–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0193

    Article Google Scholar

  • Albort-Morant G, Leal-Rodríguez AL, De Marchi V (2018) Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green innovation performance. J Knowl Manage 22:432–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0310

    Article Google Scholar

  • Alkalha Z, Reid I, Dehe B (2019) The role of absorptive capacity within supply chain quality integration. Supply Chain Management: Int J 24:805–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-10-2018-0375

    Article Google Scholar

  • Alkalha Z, Al-Zu’bi ZBM, Zighan S (2021) Investigating the impact of absorptive capacity on operational performance: the mediating role of supply chain resilience. Int J Integr Supply Manage 14:306–329. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2021.117247

    Article Google Scholar

  • Alkalha Z, Dehe B, Reid I, Al-Zu’bi ZBM (2024) Investigating the mediating impact of supplier quality integration in pharmaceutical supply chains. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. (ahead-of-print)

  • Alsawafi A, Lemke F, Yang Y (2021) The impacts of internal quality management relations on the triple bottom line: A dynamic capability perspective. Int J Prod Econ 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107927

  • Alshemari A, Breen L, Quinn G, Sivarajah U (2020) Can we create a circular pharmaceutical supply chain (CPSC) to reduce medicines waste? Pharm 8(4):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040221

    Article Google Scholar

  • Alsmairat MA (2023) Enabling supply chain efficacy through SC risk mitigation and absorptive capacity: an empirical investigation in manufacturing firms in the middle East region–a moderated-mediated model. Supply Chain Management: Int J 28(5):909–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2022-0382

    Article Google Scholar

  • Alsmairat MA, AL-Shboul MDA (2023) Enabling supply chain efficacy through supply chain absorptive capacity and ambidexterity: empirical study from middle East region-a moderated-mediation model. J Manuf Technol Manage 34(6):917–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2022-0373

    Article Google Scholar

  • Asamoah D, Acquah IN, Nuertey D, Agyei-Owusu B, Kumi CA (2024) Unpacking the role of green absorptive capacity in the relationship between green supply chain management practices and firm performance. Benchmarking: Int J 31:2793–2818. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2022-0564

    Article Google Scholar

  • Berndt AC, Gomes G, Borini FM (2024) Exploring the antecedents of frugal innovation and operational performance: the role of organizational learning capability and entrepreneurial orientation. Eur J Innov Manage 27(5):1704–1722. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2022-0320

    Article Google Scholar

  • Byttebier K (2022) COVID-19 and capitalism: success and failure of the legal methods for dealing with a pandemic. Springer Nature, Netherlands

    Book Google Scholar

  • Calvo-Mora A, Navarro-García A, Periañez-Cristobal R (2015) Project to improve knowledge management and key business results through the EFQM excellence model. Int J Project Manage 33:1638–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.010

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chatha KA, Jajja MSS, Gillani F, Farooq S (2024) Examining the effects of technology–organization–environment framework on operational performance through supply chain integration of the firm. Benchmarking: Int J 31(5):1797–1825. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2022-0665

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D (2022) Knowledge sharing in international markets for product and process innovation: moderating role of firm’s absorptive capacity. Int Mark Rev 39:706–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0261

    Article Google Scholar

  • Cheah JH, Amaro S, Roldán JL (2023) Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations. J Bus Res 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539

  • Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. J Oper Manag 22(2):pp119–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.007

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chen X, Li S, Wang X (2020) Evaluating the effects of quality regulations on the pharmaceutical supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 230:107770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107770

    Article Google Scholar

  • Chowdhury MMH, Quaddus M (2017) Supply chain resilience: conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. Int J Prod Econ 188:185–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020

    Article Google Scholar

  • Cockrell S, Friske W, Voorhees CM, Calantone RJ (2024) The effects of innovation on product recall likelihood. J Bus Res 173:p114452

    Article Google Scholar

  • Comrey AL, Lee, HB (2013) A first course in factor analysis. Psychology press. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506

  • Cubo C, Oliveira R, Fernandes AC, Sampaio P, Carvalho MS, Afonso P (2023) An innovative maturity model to assess supply chain quality management. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 40(1):103–123

    Article Google Scholar

  • Danese P, Bortolotti T (2014) Supply chain integration patterns and operational performance: a plant-level survey-based analysis. Int J Prod Res 52:7062–7083. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935515

    Article Google Scholar

  • Dultra-de-Lima RG, Brito LAL (2023) How absorptive capacity influences project performance. Int J Managing Projects Bus 16:610–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2022-0025

    Article Google Scholar

  • Elidjen E, Pertiwi A, Mursitama TN, Beng JT (2025) How potential and realized absorptive capacity increased ability to innovate: the moderating role of structural ambidexterity. VINE J Inform Knowl Manage Syst 55(1):15–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0298

    Article Google Scholar

  • Engelmann A (2024) A performative perspective on sensing, seizing, and transforming in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 36(5–6):pp632–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2262430

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fayard D, Lee LS, Leitch RA, Kettinger WJ (2012) Effect of internal cost management, information systems integration, and absorptive capacity on inter-organizational cost management in supply chains. Acc Organ Soc 37:168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.02.001

    Article Google Scholar

  • Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fuad K, Li P, Maruping L, Mathiassen L (2024) An absorptive capacity framework for investigating enterprise system ecosystems: the role of connectivity and intelligence. Enterp Inform Syst 18:2330084. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2024.2330084

    Article Google Scholar

  • Fynes B, Coughlan P, Zhang M, Zhao X, Lyles MA, Guo H (2015a) Absorptive capacity and mass customization capability. Int J Oper Prod Manage 35(9):1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0120

  • Fynes B, Professor Paul Coughlan P, Zhang M, Zhao X, Lyles MA, Guo H (2015b) Absorptive capacity and mass customization capability. Int J Oper Prod Manage 35(9):1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0120

    Article Google Scholar

  • Garcia-Buendia N, Moyano-Fuentes J, Maqueira JM, Avella L (2023) The lean supply chain management response to technology uncertainty: consequences for operational performance and competitiveness. J Manuf Technol Manage 34(1):67–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2022-0250

    Article Google Scholar

  • Ghijs S, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B (2024) The continuing challenge of drug recalls: insights from a ten-year FDA data analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116349

  • Gu M, Zhang Y, Li D, Huo B (2023) The effect of high-involvement human resource management practices on supply chain resilience and operational performance. J Manage Sci Eng 8(2):176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2022.12.001

    Article Google Scholar

  • Hair J Jr, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (2010) Multivariate data analysis; a global perspective. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, USA, p 5

    Google Scholar

  • Hair JF, Gabriel M, Patel V (2014) AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian J Mark, 13 2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676480

  • Herold DM, Marzantowicz Ł (2023) Supply chain responses to global disruptions and its ripple effects: an institutional complexity perspective. Oper Manage Res 16(4):2213–2224

    Article Google Scholar

  • Hole G, Hole AS, McFalone-Shaw I (2021) Digitalization in pharmaceutical industry: what to focus on under the digital implementation process? Int J Pharmaceutics: X 3:100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2021.100095

    Article Google Scholar

  • Honarpour A, Jusoh A, Md Nor K (2018) Total quality management, knowledge management, and innovation: an empirical study in R&D units. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 29:7–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1238760

    Article Google Scholar

  • Hong J, Zhou Z, Li X, Lau KH (2020) Supply chain quality management and firm performance in china’s food industry—the moderating role of social co-regulation. Int J Logistics Manage 31(1):99–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2018-0124

    Article Google Scholar

  • Huma S, Ahmed W, Zaman SU (2023) The impact of supply chain quality integration on a firm’s sustainable performance. TQM J 36:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2022-0167

    Article Google Scholar

  • Huma S, Muslim S, Ahmed W (2024) Understanding the role of organizational intellectual capital on developing absorptive capacity to strategize innovation ambidexterity. Rev Int Bus Strategy 34:433–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-08-2023-0088

    Article Google Scholar

  • Huo B, Qi Y, Wang Z, Zhao X (2014a) The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: the moderating role of competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management: Int J 19(4):369–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2013-0096

    Article Google Scholar

  • Huo B, Zhao X, Lai F (2014b) Supply chain quality integration: antecedents and consequences. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 61(1):38–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2013.2278543

    Article Google Scholar

  • Huo B, Ye Y, Zhao X, Zhu K (2019) Supply chain quality integration: A taxonomy perspective. Int J Prod Econ 207:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.05.004

    Article Google Scholar

  • Hurtado-Palomino A, De la Gala-Velásquez B, Ccorisapra-Quintana J (2022) The interactive effect of innovation capability and potential absorptive capacity on innovation performance. J Innov Knowl 7(4):100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100259

    Article Google Scholar

  • Khachlouf N, Quélin BV, Soparnot R (2014) Network ties and absorptive capacity for learning and decision-making. J Decis Syst 23:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2014.857211

  • Khraishi A, Paulraj A, Huq F, Seepana C (2023) Knowledge management in offshoring innovation by smes: role of internal knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity and formal knowledge-sharing routines. Supply Chain Management: Int J 28:405–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2021-0256

    Article Google Scholar

  • Kumar G (2023) Critical success factors of adopting an enterprise system for pharmaceutical drug traceability. Univers J Pharm Pharmacol 2:3–10. https://doi.org/10.31586/ujpp.2023.738

    Article Google Scholar

  • Kumar A, Singh RK, Modgil S (2023) Influence of data-driven supply chain quality management on organizational performance: evidences from retail industry. TQM J 35(1):24–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2020-0146

    Article Google Scholar

  • Laursen K, Leone MI, Torrisi S (2010) Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee’s point of view. Industrial Corp Change 19(3):871–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq034

    Article Google Scholar

  • Lee KL, Teong CX, Alzoubi HM, Alshurideh MT, Khatib ME, Al-Gharaibeh SM (2024) Digital supply chain transformation: the role of smart technologies on operational performance in manufacturing industry. Int J Eng Bus Manage 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/184797902412349

  • Lin B, Zhu Y (2025) Supply chain configuration and total factor productivity of renewable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115140

  • Lin C, Kuei Ch, Chai KW (2013) Identifying critical enablers and pathways to high performance supply chain quality management. Int J Oper Prod Manage 33(3):347–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311300818

    Article Google Scholar

  • Lin Q, Zhao Q, Lev B (2020) Cold chain transportation decision in the vaccine supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 283(1):182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.005

    Article Google Scholar

  • Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Chen H, Gu J, Huang Q (2009) From IT Capabilities to Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Effects of Supply Chain Agility and Absorptive Capacity. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings,pp.225

  • Liu W, Liu X, Choi TM (2023) Effects of supply chain quality event announcements on stock market reaction: an empirical study from China. Int J Oper Prod Manage 43(2):197–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0638

    Article Google Scholar

  • Lowry P.B., Gaskin J. (2014) Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for Building and testing behavioral causal theory: when to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 57(2):pp123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452

  • Luo L, Liu X, Zhao X, Flynn BB (2023) The impact of supply chain quality leadership onsupply chain quality integration and quality performance. Supply Chain Management: Int J28:508–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2021-0235

  • Machingura T, Adetunji O, Maware C (2024) A hierarchical complementary Lean-Green model and its impact on operational performance of manufacturing organisations. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 41(2):425–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2022-0115

    Article Google Scholar

  • Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16(4):407–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7

    Article Google Scholar

  • Manzoor U, Baig SA, Hashim M, Sami A, Rehman HU, Sajjad I (2022) The effect of supply chain agility and lean practices on operational performance: a resource-based view and dynamic capabilities perspective. TQM J 34:1273–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2021-0006

    Article Google Scholar

  • Minshull LK, Dehe B, Kotcharin S (2022) Exploring the impact of a sequential lean implementation within a micro-firm–a socio-technical perspective. J Bus Res 151:156–169

    Article Google Scholar

  • Miocevic D, Crnjak-Karanovic B (2012) The mediating role of key supplier relationship management practices on supply chain orientation—The organizational buying effectiveness link. Industrial Marketing Management 41(1):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.015

  • Mirza S, Mahmood A, Waqar H (2022) The interplay of open innovation and strategic innovation: unpacking the role of organizational learning ability and absorptive capacity. Int J Eng Bus Manage 14:18479790211069745. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211069

    Article Google Scholar

  • Nagurney A, Li D, Nagurney LS (2013) Pharmaceutical supply chain networks with outsourcing under price and quality competition. Int Trans Oper Res 20:859–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12031

    Article Google Scholar

  • Najafi Tavani S, Sharifi H, Ismail S, H (2013) A study of contingency relationships between supplier involvement, absorptive capacity and agile product innovation. Int J Oper Prod Manage 34(1):65–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2011-0331

    Article Google Scholar

  • Narayana S, Elias A, Pati A, R (2014) Reverse logistics in the pharmaceuticals industry: a systemic analysis. Int J Logistics Manage 25:379–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2012-0073

    Article Google Scholar

  • Neuman WL (2013) Social research methods: pearson new international edition. Pearson Education Limited.US

  • Oliveira-Dias D, Maqueira-Marín JM, Moyano-Fuentes J, Tortorella G (2025) How does the technology environment impact supply chain strategy and operational performance? J Manuf Technol Manage 36(1):203–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2024-0127

    Article Google Scholar

  • Patrucco AS, Marzi G, Trabucchi D (2023) The role of absorptive capacity and big data analytics in strategic purchasing and supply chain management decisions. Technovation 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102814

  • Polater A (2024) In pursuit of increasing supply chain innovation performance through suppliers’ promotive voice: the moderating role of unlearning and transparency. Oper Manage Res 17(1):55–74

    Article Google Scholar

  • Qiao R, Zhao L (2023) Reduce supply chain financing risks through supply chain integration: dual approaches of alleviating information asymmetry and mitigating supply chain risks. J Enterp Inform Manage 36:1533–1555. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2023-0016

    Article Google Scholar

  • Rafique M, Hameed S, Agha MH (2019) Impact of instrumental ties, Tacit knowledge sharing and affective commitment on absorptive capacity–an empirical study of pharmaceutical companies. Technol Anal Strategic Manage No 31(2):125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1490017

    Article Google Scholar

  • Richey RG, Roath AS, Adams FG, Wieland A (2022) A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. J Bus Logistics 43(1):62–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12290

    Article Google Scholar

  • Riquelme-Medina M, Stevenson M, Barrales-Molina V, Llorens-Montes FJ (2022) Coopetition in business ecosystems: the key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. J Bus Res 146:464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.071

    Article Google Scholar

  • Rodríguez-González RM, Madrid-Guijarro A, Maldonado-Guzmán G (2023) Digital organizational culture and absorptive capacity as precursors to supply chain resilience and sustainable performance. J Clean Prod 420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138411

  • Salam MA, Bajaba S (2023) The role of supply chain resilience and absorptive capacity in the relationship between marketing–supply chain management alignment and firm performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. J Bus Industrial Mark 38:1545–1561. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2022-0105

    Article Google Scholar

  • Saroha M, Garg D, Luthra S (2022) Identification and analysis of circular supply chain management practices for sustainability: a fuzzy-DEMATEL approach. Int J Productivity Perform Manage 71:722–747. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2020-0613

    Article Google Scholar

  • Schleifenheimer M, Ivanov D (2024) Pharmaceutical retail supply chain responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, pp 1–26

  • Sedoglavich V, Akoorie ME, Pavlovich K (2015) Measuring absorptive capacity in high-tech companies: mixing qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Methods Res 9:252–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814523677

    Article Google Scholar

  • Sharma M, Joshi S (2023) Digital supplier selection reinforcing supply chain quality management systems to enhance firm’s performance. TQM J 35:102–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2020-0160

    Article Google Scholar

  • Sharma M, Kaushal D, Joshi S (2023) Strategic measures for enhancing resiliency in knowledge base supply chains: an emerging economy perspective. Oper Manage Res 16(3):1185–1205

    Article Google Scholar

  • Siddh MM, Soni G, Jain R, Sharma MK, Yadav V (2021) A framework for managing the agri-fresh food supply chain quality in Indian industry. Manage Environ Quality: Int J 32(2):436–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2020-0085

    Article Google Scholar

  • Sim M, Kim SY, Suh Y (2022) Sample size requirements for simple and complex mediation models. Educ Psychol Meas 82(1):76–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211003261

    Article Google Scholar

  • Sivo SA, Fan X, Witta EL, Willse JT (2006) The search for optimal cutoff properties: fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. J Experimental Educ 74:267–288. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.267-288

    Article Google Scholar

  • Soo C, Tian AW, Teo ST, Cordery J (2017) Intellectual capital–enhancing HR, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Hum Resour Manag 56:431–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21783

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tayyab M, Awan MU, Bukhari NI, Sabet E (2022) Key determinants of quality in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 39:345–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2020-0213

    Article Google Scholar

  • Tchonkouang RD, Onyeaka H, Nkoutchou H (2024) Assessing the vulnerability of food supply chains to climate change-induced disruptions. Sci Total Environ 920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171047

  • Teece D.J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28 No13:pp1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

  • Teece DJ (2019) A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective. N Z Econ Papers 53(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208

    Article Google Scholar

  • Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18 No7:pp509–533.

  • Todorova G, Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Acad Manage Rev 32 No 3774–786. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275513

  • Tse YK, Zhang M, Tan KH, Pawar K, Fernandes K (2018) Managing quality risk in supply chain to drive firm’s performance: the roles of control mechanisms. J Bus Res 97:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.029

    Article Google Scholar

  • Van Nguyen T, Pham HT, Ha HM, Tran TTT (2024) An integrated model of supply chain quality management, industry 3.5 and innovation to improve manufacturers’ performance–a case study of Vietnam. Int J Logistics Res Appl 27(2):261–283

    Article Google Scholar

  • WHO (2020) Medical Product Alert N° 1/2020: Falsified antimalarials displaying an outdated WHO Essential Drugs Programme logo. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news/item/09-03-2020-medical-product-alert-n-1-2020-english-version. Accessed 07/12/2023

  • Widiaswara A, Santosa W, Dewayana TS (2024) Improving operational performance: the influence of Buyer-Supplier relationship, supply chain quality, and firm CSR to enhancing supplier performance. Indonesian Interdisciplinary J Sharia Econ (IIJSE) 8(1):1255–1272. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i1.5645

    Article Google Scholar

  • Wiengarten F, Longoni A (2015) A nuanced view on supply chain integration: a coordinative and collaborative approach to operational and sustainability performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: Int J 20:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2014-0120

    Article Google Scholar

  • Wong KKK (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Mark Bull 24:1–32

    Google Scholar

  • Wong CY, Boon-itt S, Wong C (2011) The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. J Oper Manag 29:604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.003

    Article Google Scholar

  • Wu R, Huo B, Yu Y, Zhang Z (2022) Quality and green management for operational and environmental performance: relational capital in supply chain management. Int J Logistics Res Appl 25(4–5):471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1836138

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27:185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhang M, Zhao X, Lyles M, Guo H (2015a) Absorptive capacity and mass customization capability. Int J Oper Prod Manage 35:1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0120

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhang P, Xiong Y, Xiong Z (2015b) Coordination of a dual-channel supply chain after demand or production cost disruptions. Int J Prod Res 53(10):3141–3160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.975853

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhang M, Guo H, Huo B, Zhao X, Huang J (2017) Linking supply chain quality integration with mass customization and product modularity. Int J Prod Econ 207:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.011

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhang M, Guo H, Huo B, Zhao X, Huang J (2019) Linking supply chain quality integration with mass customization and product modularity. Int J Prod Econ 207:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.011

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhao X, Li Y, Flynn BB (2013) The financial impact of product recall announcements in China. Int J Prod Econ 142:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.018

    Article Google Scholar

  • Zhao N, Hong J, Lau KH (2023) Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model. Int J Prod Econ 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108817

  • Zighan S, Dwaikat NY, Alkalha Z, Abualqumboz M (2024) Knowledge management for supply chain resilience in pharmaceutical industry: evidence from the middle East region. Int J Logistics Manage 35(4):1142–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2022-0215

    Article Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

    Ziad Alkalha

  2. Supply Chain & Operations Management Department, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Benjamin Dehe

  3. Faculty of Business and Law, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Iain Reid

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziad Alkalha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

About this article

Cite this article

Alkalha, Z., Dehe, B. & Reid, I. How absorptive capacity mediates supply chain effectiveness: a quality integration approach to boosting operational performance. Oper Manag Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-025-00559-8

  • Received
  • Revised
  • Accepted
  • Published
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-025-00559-8

Keywords

  • Quality management
  • Supply chain quality integration
  • Absorptive capacity
  • Dynamic capability
  • Pharmaceutical supply chains

Copyright © All rights reserved Designed and Developed by Digital Flavers

WhatsApp